Does Birmingham have the right ingredients to build successful communities?

Collage Favourites - set 42 By tdietmut

Do we? If we do, what are they? And if we don’t, what can we do about it? Or should we do anything at all?

As part of the Social Inclusion Process we have been looking at learning from elsewhere to challenge views, one of these sources is Future Communities. Their focus looks at creating new communities, but with Birmingham’s rapidly changing population there are new communities being created on a regular basis (see What is Superdiversity?).

Successful communities need to be built in partnership with practitioners but most of all residents are essential in providing the catalyst in maintaining any long term influence and involvement.

Future Communities, echoes this constantly in that, residents bring a place a live and builds its own identity. So what are the key ingredients they have identified that we do automatically as a city?

According to them there are ten key community ingredients:

Residents in control: governance, engagement and accountability
Early engagement of future and existing residents
Facilitating social networks
Choosing a stewardship approach  
Community ownership and management of assets
Maintaining high quality public space
Promoting environmentally friendly behaviours
Achieving good design  
Economic development 
The role of the HCA and other community builders  

If we don’t have the right ingredients, what can we learn from those above? What can implement now to keep up with the challenges of a city that continually transforms itself?

Then again, Birmingham is unique. What other ingredients do we have that no other city could have?

Preparing the Ground

Image

In agriculture it is important to prepare the ground in order to help fresh shoots grow. As part of the preparation for the task of encouraging economic growth, the Inclusive Economic Growth KLOE held a very successful second meeting on Friday (25th). These are truly fascination meetings with the air electrically charged with wonderful ideas, discussions, and anecdotal evidence adduced.

Now I can’t claim to be able to follow all the discussion, but with Directors, Professors, Lecturers, Assistant Principals and other eminent thinkers present I can possibly be forgiven for getting a little lost sometime. One thing clearly in its favour is that it is a relatively acronym free discussion.

There is also a genuine high level of passion present. Everyone there – regardless of their status – is there because they want to see an end to economic exclusion. They are looking for solutions, practical, workable, implementable solutions, to the major issues of unemployment, social and economic deprivation, and poverty.

At Friday’s meeting topics covered included how to deal with the skills mismatch, where our schools and colleges are turning our people with skills our local business don’t want or need. How we can help prepare our young people to become, “work ready”? Teaching them to understanding that to keep a job you need to get up every morning and go to work on time; you need to be able to dress appropriately; you need to be polite, and be professional in how you answer the telephone. Skills that may seem self evident but which Businesses report are basic skills that are often lacking.

The ability to create a good CV requires skill too, and we currently tend to place a very high value on educational qualifications and display these prominently on our CV’s. Some of Friday’s discussion explored ways to harness our wider life-skills, i.e. things we do in our spare time, hobbies, interests, skills we may not even consider to be skills. We develop skills in the pursuit of our personal interest and often these are very valuable and essential skills. To understand our potential contribution to the work force it was suggested we consider the idea, promoted in Irish schools, of the “Transition Year”.

The aim of the Transition Year:-

“…is to promote the personal, social, educational and vocational development of pupils and to prepare them for their role as autonomous, participative and responsible members of society.”

Sounds like a great idea! Our young school children are all going to end up in the ‘real world’ at the end of their school days – does it not make sense to prepare them for it?

Other discussions examined ways to encourage the creation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME’s). Further thought was devoted to the need to encourage and promote entrepreneurial ability. One successful example cited was the creation of the Balti. What a wonderful and financially successful idea that has been forBirmingham.

Further thought was devoted to the creation of more Social Enterprises and the significant role they could play in dealing both with economic inequality and unemployment.

These are still early days for this KLOE and it will probably continue after the others have drawn to a close, given the long term nature of Economic Growth but, whatever the outcome it will certainly be a rich a fruitful endeavour and the preparation undertaken now will ensure that whatever new shoots do push through, are able to flourish and grow in to full maturity. Watch this space…

How deprived is your area?

Thanks to @paulgslatter and @siouxsiesmith on Twitter for highlighting this website which is really helpful in gaining a snap shot of poverty in your area.  The data is based on Church parishes which some people will not identify with/recognise, and means that you are comparing areas of different size, but it  gives an idea just how your area compares to the less and most deprived in the country

http://www.cuf.org.uk/povertyinengland

For more local stats take a visit to our data website – http://local.bebirmingham.org.uk

Songs of Prosperity

Money, Money, Money

The KLOE for Inclusive Economic Growth – part ofBirmingham’s SIP has arrived at the following question:

How do we change the way our citizens are connected into the economic life of Birmingham so that everyone has opportunity to benefit from its growth and prosperity as the city becomes more successful and competitive? 

Clearly there are many ways of tackling such a question but for me what immediately springs to mind is a further question: Does the economic system we currently have contain within it a systemic bias towards exclusion?

Birmingham is very successful in creating Millionaires. In February this year the University f Birmingham published an article stating that the results of a recent survey showed thatBirmingham was among the top 10 Universities in the UK for producing millionaires. On 21st March 2011 the Birmingham Mail joyfully announced that there are now 92,000 millionaires dotted across the region (a 15% increase on the year before). So clearly theWest Midlands does not have a problem in generating wealth. The problem seems to be who gets it, and what they do with it. The green demon of Greed quickly seems to raise its head. (Dare I mention Banker’s bonuses at this point?)

Our society tends to focus on the Self – one could even argue selfishness. A popular TV programme ‘Who wants to be a millionaire?’ testifies, through its very success, that the old song answer ‘I do!’ is not far from the truth. The riots we had in 2011 showed how far we have moved towards ‘living in a material world’.

Maybe one way we can tackle this question is to come at it from what American’s refer to as ‘left field’. Maybe we need to be asking, ‘How we can inculcate values of generosity and not greed into our citizens?’ Maybe we ought to find ways of developing an awareness and concern for others in our society, by trying to be less selfish and more selfless.

Maybe we ought to review the way wealth is distributed. If every one of the millionaires in theWest Midlandscontributed a mere £100, that would be £10 million which could be used to fight against poverty in the city.

But we don’t only need to rely on millionaires. Maybe we can all give more, maybe as we currently simplify our lives due to the economic constraints currently existing, we can catch a glimpse of our own shared humanity and realise that there is more to life than money  – which we know can’t buy love! Possibly, until we are able to develop a more pervasive culture of generosity and inculcate a greater sense of selflessness, and review the nature and means of our current methods of Economic growth and production, we will continue to have economic exclusion!

BirminghamMail:

http://www.birminghammail.net/news/top-stories/2011/03/21/midlands-millionaires-total-booms-despite-record-job-losses-97319-28372667/

University:

http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/schools/social-policy/news/2012/02/top-10-uk-universities-millionaires.aspx

Local Giving:-

Our mission is to enable philanthropic giving to small local charities and community groups in the UK.

http://localgiving.com/

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Summit at Aston University

On Friday, 20th April, I attended the early part of the Midlands CSR Summit – ‘Business Critical’.

This event hosted by Aston University.

ABS building

Business Leaders, Corporate Social Responsibility Directors, key Government and voluntary sector organisation figures presented and led debates on important issues affecting business and community relations in this region.

The event was opened by Prof Julia King and the key note address was given by Lord Nat Wei, former Government Advisor (Big Society). The event was a great success and attended by around 100 delegates.

The focus was very much on social issues in and around Birmingham. Bishop David spoke about Be Birmingham Social Inclusion process and the DVD consisting of interviews by the KLOE leads which was made specially for the BB Summit was shown.

Is transport too expensive in Brum?


This is a short post but i think it is important to talk about one of the major issues which is coming up time and time again through our engagement activity – the cost of transport – in particular for young people.  So we really wanted to ask the question – is transport proving to be a major barrier for people in the city? and if so…what can we do about it?!

In November the UK Young Parliament urged ministers to cut the cost of public transport and make it more accessible, and backed a motion urging the government to make it ”cheaper, better and accessible to all”.  They believed that high transport costs were a major barrier and prevented young people accessing jobs and education and therefore had a significant impact on levels on youth unemployment.

This view has been reinforced through our various meetings with young people and youth organisations over the past few weeks.

But its not just the cost of getting to work.  Transport is key to connecting different communities and areas across the city.  With much money over the years spent on regenerating the city centre, many families on low incomes from the outer areas of the city feel they cannot share in the benefit that the city centre can offer.  This has lead to feelings of isolation in many communities, with some people feeling that their area has been “left behind”. For example the cost to bring a family from Kings Norton into the city centre is now£8.50 – many feel this is too expensive.

At the National Youth Reference Group conference in Birmingham last week, delegates from London highlighted the success of Transport for London’s policy of free bus travel between the ages of 11 and 15….is this something we could replicate in Birmingham?

What are your thoughts?  How can we address this? We want to hear off you so please let us know!

Birmingham Social Inclusion Process, brap; Line in the Sand, Tweets from today.

As well as live blogging through today’s event, those  who were in attendance were also taking part in a conversation on twitter using the #fairbrum tag.

All the updates were displayed on a large screen for the delgates to see and now using storify we’ve bought them all together in one place for you to read too.  Follow this link to see all updates sent throughout the brap event this morning and there is still a conversation ongoing on twitter so please feel free to join in and  add your thoughts there too.

Panel Discussion – inequality of opportunity is it race or “class” that’s the issue?

Question from the floor to David and Raja – Despite all the stats is poverty of oppurtunity more about class than ethnicity?

David:  No, class is is hugely important as is disability, as is gender as is age. – Stats can be read in many ways when looking at different stats some groups disappear – Class is hugely important but it deosn explain other inequaltes we have to look at how all these different thing intersect.

We should avoid “inequality olympics” no one form of inequality shoudl be pitched as being worse than another. If we only focus on class we can actually make other problems worse.

Raja: I remember when class was first introduced into the race debate – it was just used as another measure to divide us, from my own experiences we differentiate white people by class but there seems to be a different measuring stick for BME groups so they are different issues.

A Line in the Sand – responses to the survey

500 young people were asked questions about education, employment and inclusion and it has thrown up some interesting points;

  • A lot felt that individuality was not encouraged and dreams and aspirations were to be left at the door
  • Some felt that current employment opportunities gave you nothing to work towards there was no room for growth.
  • 50% of the people who dropped out of education or training did so because of financial reasons but 32% said they would have continued if they had the support of someone who believed in them.
  • Young peoples self esteem plays a huge role when looking at those in employment – a constant barrage of negativity towards youths is detrimental to young peoples wellbeing.
  • Respect – some young people felt that respect often wasn’t a mutual thing. They we expected to respect employers but that wasn’t returned, or earned.
  • BME young people felt that opportunities weren’t available to them
  • Some young people felt that there wasn’t enough information about the support and opportunities that were available – they we’re missing out just because they didn’t know what was there

So what should we do about this? – It will be discussed at the open panel session….

City Year gets us going bananas….

City Year is a London based organisation working with young people, Their website says

“City Year is the leading youth and education charity in London. We are the only coordinated opportunity for full time volunteering within English schools.

No other movement for social change offers young people the chance to volunteer full time for a whole year in inner city schools.

City Year is special because we believe young people can change the world.”

They often get people set up for sessions using physical Education – this is a group of volunteers from City Year getting the brap / fairbrum delegates ready for the second part of the Line in the Sand Conference

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,428 other followers