“Open Space” session

The friendly yellow brick walls of the main Auditorium of the CBSO Centre are more used to the dulcet tones of orchestral rehearsals. Today they are, once more, playing host to the cacophony of excited voices discussing the outcomes of the Social Inclusion Green Paper.

Friendly disagreements are taking place as people share views and opinions and different ways to do things.

A man I just spoke to expressed shock and anger that the situation in Birmingham had got so bad. “We are all to blame but how can we find creative ways to solve this?” He asks somewhat exasperated.

People are wandering  round the open rooms examining the display boards which show the commitments and recommendations from the Green Paper along with some of the initial research and  findings about the level of need and deprivation across the City.

The Bishop is here engaging in enthusiastic discussion stimulating fresh thinking on the topic and hopefully managing to get commitments from people to help change the status quo.

Is the economic activity and community life in Balsall Heath, Castle Vale, Sparkbrook, and Sutton Coldfield really different in any meaningful way?

As part of the Social Inclusion Process the Inclusive Economic Growth Key Line of Enquiry (KLOE) reference group came up with several recommendations which have been incorporated into the Green Paper under Commitment one: Support families and children out of poverty.

It was argued that different parts of the city had different approaches to community and economic development (were in fact different ‘locales’) and that this fact not only needed to be recognised, but should be built upon. This ‘locale’ approach would ensure that investment, infrastructure development and the way the community operated in that locality would be incorporated into any development plans and policies to ensure they were the best possible match for that area. (Green Paper – 1.2 Develop an approach to “locales”.)

Sparkbrook

This is a very important new approach to community and economic development but is it true? Do you think the economic activity in Castle Vale is different from that undertaken in Balsall Heath? Do the residents of Sparkbrook engage in economic activity so different from those in Sutton Coldfield?

Sutton Coldfield

Let us know?

The Notting Hill of Birmingham

Image - Balsall Heath Forum

Balsall Heath Forum website

I must admin I am as guilty as the next person of making assumptions about an area I’ve never visited based on what I’ve read. Balsall Heath was one of those areas. Although I am aware of the excellent work done by Balsall Heath Forum and others in the area, it still wasn’t somewhere I would immediately consider when looking for somewhere to live.

However, on behalf of the wellbeing KLOE, I recently visited a project run by ‘Saheli Women’, and spoke to residents of Balsall Heath. My previous misgivings have now changed completely.

‘A hidden gem’ and ‘The Notting Hill of Birmingham’ were two of the really positive descriptions that came from the residents. Another who moved there from another area of the city said “Balsall Heath is a wonderful place to live, much better than where I lived before. Not many people move away from this area, why would they?”

The overall view from the group was that it is a welcoming place having a real sense of community. People enjoy living there, its peaceful, residents help each other out, some neighbours will take round food to welcome newcomers. “You’ll never go hungry here at Ramadan”.

The sense of wellbeing within the group was high, based on the strength of community enjoyed there by people from it’s range of diverse backgrounds. They were keen to end the previous stigma attached Balsall Heath which is based on events of the past, and not on the vibrant urban area that it is now.

By the end of the session I was thinking ‘should I sell up and move to Balsall Heath?’. If anyone is in doubt, I would recommend they go and actually see the place and speak to the people who live there before forming an opinion based merely on perception.

Redevelopment approaches: Castle Vale, Attwood Green and Balsall Heath

I’m in a discussion looking at the Diversity of Place line of enquiry in room 4.

The framing question to attendees:

What are the underlying reasons why some neighbourhoods are more successful, connected and socially included than others, and what do we need to do to achieve positive change for the areas that need it?

Take three different neighbourhoods in Birmingham that have taken three different approaches to improving the area: Castle Vale, Attwood Green, Balsall Heath.

Castle Vale

Castle Vale had a stigma attached to it; a white, working class social housing estate. £100m invested. Look at the way the redevelopment has been managed. They completely transformed the social housing stock and codesigned the area with employers, residents and businesses. It’s now an attractive place to live.

One view on what made Castle Vale work – Castle Vale made their own housing action trust (HAT) [added 17/03/2012: succeeded by the community housing association] and Sainsbury’s were involved too.

Attwood Green

Very different approach, which was effectively gentrification. Moving the poor people out, reinventing it and selling the area to new people arriving.

Balsall Heath

Balsall Heath has continually reinvented itself. The area has not had the money invested that Castle Vale has but is thriving, successful and an interesting, vibrant neighbourhood.

Other notes…

When we do come into an area to redevelop it, we make promises about changing the residents’ life and values. We don’t always do the right thing to encourage those people back into the area after the area is redeveloped.

Problems mentioned specific to areas with poverty: how do you get people to use the services offered when there is investment in poorer areas? Discussion about an example in Kingstanding – the geography of the place affected whether young people would cross one side of Kingstanding where they live to the other side where the service is offered.

Prized modern developments in the city can be irrelevant to people living in neighbourhoods with high poverty, such as the architectural wonder of the new central library or High Speed 2.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,428 other followers